Home / Blog / Properties of spouses under a void marriage are governed by rules on co-ownership

POPULAR POSTS

RECENT COMMENTS​

    Properties of spouses under a void marriage are governed by rules on co-ownership



    Dear PAO,

    I have been married for 10 years now. My husband and I have gone through several challenging moments during our time together. I have always been on the receiving end; if not for my love for him, I would have separated from him even during the early years of our marriage. However, his womanizing, compulsive gambling and abusive behavior toward me appear to be hopeless and are already taking a heavy toll on my overall well-being. Consequently, I am planning to file a petition to nullify our marriage on the grounds of psychological incapacity. If the court grants my petition, how will our properties be treated?

    Nikki

    Dear Nikki,

    The answer to your query is found in Article 147 of the Family Code of the Philippines.

    Get the latest news


    delivered to your inbox

    Sign up for The Manila Times newsletters

    By signing up with an email address, I acknowledge that I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

    If your marriage will be declared void, your property relation will be treated as that of co-ownership; thus, Article 147 provides that:

    “Art. 147. When a man and a woman who are capacitated to marry each other, live exclusively with each other as husband and wife without the benefit of marriage or under a void marriage, their wages and salaries shall be owned by them in equal shares, and the property acquired by both of them through their work or industry shall be governed by the rules on co-ownership.

    “In the absence of proof to the contrary, properties acquired while they lived together shall be presumed to have been obtained by their joint efforts, work or industry, and shall be owned by them in equal shares. For purposes of this Article, a party who did not participate in the acquisition by the other party of any property shall be deemed to have contributed jointly in the acquisition thereof if the former’s efforts consisted in the care and maintenance of the family and of the household.

    “Neither party can encumber or dispose by acts inter vivos of his or her share in the property acquired during cohabitation and owned in common, without the consent of the other, until after the termination of their cohabitation.

    “When only one of the parties to a void marriage is in good faith, the share of the party in bad faith in the co-ownership shall be forfeited in favor of their common children. In case of default of or waiver by any or all of the common children or their descendants, each vacant share shall belong to the respective surviving descendants. In the absence of descendants, such share shall belong to the innocent party. In all cases, the forfeiture shall take place upon termination of the cohabitation.”

    In your case, no impediment to marry has been shown to have existed on either the two of you. You both lived exclusively with each other as husband and wife for around a decade. However, your marriage may be found to be void under Article 36 of the Family Code on the grounds of psychological incapacity due to your husband being a womanizer, compulsive gambler and with abusive conduct. Should the Court so declare, the ground of psychological incapacity clearly falls under Article 147 of the Family Code. The above-quoted provision provides that your wages and salaries shall be owned by both of you in equal shares, and the property you both acquired through your work or industry shall be presumed to have been obtained by your joint efforts and thus shall be governed by the rules on co-ownership. Hence, your property relations will be under co-ownership.

    We hope that we were able to answer your queries. This advice is based solely on the facts you have narrated and our appreciation of the same. Our opinion may vary when other facts are changed or elaborated.


    Editor’s note: Dear PAO is a daily column of the Public Attorney’s Office. Questions for Chief Acosta may be sent to [email protected]



    Source link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Recent News

    On the edge of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area, a novice learns to drive her own team on an adventure in the heart of winter.

    Even far from hubs like Dubai and Abu Dhabi, the disruptions from the growing violence have left people jumping “from one cancellation to the next.”

    Seeming to acknowledge critics’ complaints about the high cost of snow sports, the company is cutting the price of its 2026-2027 Epic Passes for younger

    Drones and missiles have closed airports and caused chaos across the Middle East since the U.S. and Israel attacked Iran on Saturday. We want to

    Hundreds of thousands have been stranded since the conflict started. The United States urged Americans to leave and said on Tuesday it was “actively working

    The Emirates’ reputation as a safe destination in a volatile area was put to a brutal test in recent days as Iran, retaliating against U.S.-Israeli